A standard procedure for naming time sequence data (TSD) files, such as files produced by digital fault recorders, power swing recorders, power quality monitors, and so on, is specified. The sources of TSD files are described, and a survey of current naming techniques is provided. The advantages of using a common naming procedure are highlighted, and the limitations and applications are identified. Issues of compatibility across operating systems and various vintages, and adaptability to other types of files, are also discussed. The required and optional portions of the naming procedure are described in detail, and many examples are provided.
- Standard Committee
- PE/PSRCC - Power System Relaying and Control
- Status
- Inactive-Reserved Standard
- PAR Approval
- 2011-02-02
- Superseding
- C37.232-2007
- Board Approval
- 2011-10-31
- History
-
- ANSI Approved:
- 2013-01-11
- Published:
- 2011-11-09
- Inactivated Date:
- 2022-03-24
Working Group Details
- Society
- IEEE Power and Energy Society
- Standard Committee
- PE/PSRCC - Power System Relaying and Control
- Working Group
-
C37.232_WG - (Inactive) File Name Convention Working Group
Learn More About C37.232_WG - (Inactive) File Name Convention Working Group - IEEE Program Manager
- Malia Zaman
Contact Malia Zaman - Working Group Chair
- Eric Allen
Other Activities From This Working Group
Current projects that have been authorized by the IEEE SA Standards Board to develop a standard.
No Active Projects
Standards approved by the IEEE SA Standards Board that are within the 10-year lifecycle.
No Active Standards
These standards have been replaced with a revised version of the standard, or by a compilation of the original active standard and all its existing amendments, corrigenda, and errata.
C37.232-2007
IEEE Recommended Practice for Naming Time Sequence Data Files
A procedure for naming time sequence data (TSD) files, such as files produced by digital fault recorders, power swing recorders, power quality monitors, and so on is recommended. The sources of TSD files are described, and a survey of current naming techniques is provided. The advantages of using a common naming procedure are highlighted, and the limitations and applications are identified. Issues of compatibility across operating systems and various vintages, and adaptability to other types of files are also discussed. The required and optional portions of the naming procedure are described in detail, and many examples are provided.
These standards have been removed from active status through a ballot where the standard is made inactive as a consensus decision of a balloting group.
No Inactive-Withdrawn Standards
These standards are removed from active status through an administrative process for standards that have not undergone a revision process within 10 years.
No Inactive-Reserved Standards