This document provides guidance for an objective evaluation of flow batteries by a potential user for any stationary application. This document is to be used in conjunction with IEEE Std 1679, IEEE Recommended Practice for the Characterization and Evaluation of Emerging Energy Storage Technologies in Stationary Applications. A flow battery is characterized by electrolytes flowing past both electrodes. Examples include: - Redox flow batteries, such as vanadium redox - Hybrid flow batteries, such as zinc-bromine The outline of IEEE Std 1679 is followed in this document, with tutorial information specific to flow batteries provided as appropriate. Examples of tutorial information include technology descriptions, operating parameters, failure modes, safety information, battery architecture, and qualification and application considerations. This document does not cover sizing, installation, maintenance and testing techniques, except insofar as they may influence the evaluation of a flow battery for its intended application.
- Standard Committee
- PE/ESSB - Energy Storage & Stationary Battery Committee
- Status
- Active PAR
- PAR Approval
- 2018-12-05
Working Group Details
- Society
- IEEE Power and Energy Society
- Standard Committee
- PE/ESSB - Energy Storage & Stationary Battery Committee
- Working Group
-
WG_1679.3 - Flow Battery Working Group
Learn More About WG_1679.3 - Flow Battery Working Group - IEEE Program Manager
- Michael Kipness
Contact Michael Kipness - Working Group Chair
- Vilayanur Viswanathan
Other Activities From This Working Group
Current projects that have been authorized by the IEEE SA Standards Board to develop a standard.
No Active Projects
Standards approved by the IEEE SA Standards Board that are within the 10-year lifecycle.
No Active Standards
These standards have been replaced with a revised version of the standard, or by a compilation of the original active standard and all its existing amendments, corrigenda, and errata.
No Superseded Standards
These standards have been removed from active status through a ballot where the standard is made inactive as a consensus decision of a balloting group.
No Inactive-Withdrawn Standards
These standards are removed from active status through an administrative process for standards that have not undergone a revision process within 10 years.
No Inactive-Reserved Standards